Sesame — Yield
Metadata research draftEvidence limits
⚠️ Status: metadata draft. Every DOI below is a candidate metadata record from the survey research/sesame-seeds/report.md — title and identifier only, not screened evidence. No yield number is accepted or quoted on this page — not even a range. The survey’s rule: “All field-yield values require cultivar/capsule type, environment, density, water/fertility, maturity, harvest method, shattering loss, and clean-seed definition. Seed yield and extracted-oil yield remain separate” (§3.10). Substantive values remain Unknown until S-#### source notes exist (docs/methodology/evidence.md).
Seed yield vs extracted-oil yield — never combine
Section titled “Seed yield vs extracted-oil yield — never combine”- Clean-seed yield (what the plot returns as harvested, cleaned seed) and extracted-oil yield (oil recovered per unit of that seed) are different quantities with different determinants. Seed yield belongs to the field; oil yield multiplies it by a processing recovery that is itself Evidence: Unknown.
yield.seed_kg_haandyield.oil_g_per_kg_seedare separate fields indata/crops/sesame.yaml, and both are null. Evidence: Known (project rule; survey §2, §3.10). - Reporting “kg/ha of sesame” without saying seed or oil, or quoting an oil figure as a field yield, is the primary error this page exists to prevent.
Every yield value must carry its context
Section titled “Every yield value must carry its context”- Before any number can be published it needs: cultivar and capsule type · environment/location · plant density · water and fertility regime · maturity at harvest · harvest method · shattering/seed loss · definition of “clean seed” (survey §3.10). A yield without these is uninterpretable and will not be accepted into
data/crops/sesame.yaml. - Loss interacts with yield directly: dehiscence-driven shatter loss, pest loss, and threshing/cleaning loss all sit between standing crop and clean seed (
harvesting.md). A “yield” that ignores them is a different, larger quantity.
Candidate evidence (coverage only)
Section titled “Candidate evidence (coverage only)”- Tillage, sesame seed yield, energy budget, and economic return (
10.3906/tar-1011-1505, 2012) — a systems record; no result claimed. - Production challenges/opportunities review for Myanmar (
10.3390/su12093515, 2020); Uganda production/export trends (10.1051/ocl/2020073, 2021) — country-level reviews/trends, not plot yields, and not transferable across environments. - Yield/quality research review (
10.3389/fpls.2022.863521, 2022) — a review candidate; what it aggregates is unread. - Smallholder technical efficiency (
10.1007/s43546-023-00604-3, 2023) — a farm-economics framing of yield gaps, not a yield value. - Mexico: genotype × environment interaction in sesame germplasm (
10.1002/agj2.70077, 2025; metadata-level candidate — survey §4). No farm budget or household recovery outcome is established. - These titles establish that yield topics are covered by the corpus. None of them yields a usable number at this stage, and national statistics from other continents say nothing about a Mexican household plot.
“Clean seed” must be defined before any comparison
Section titled ““Clean seed” must be defined before any comparison”- A yield number is meaningless until “clean seed” is defined — winnowed only? screened to what? at what moisture? The survey requires the clean-seed definition to travel with every field-yield value (§3.10). A household measurement and a research measurement with different definitions are not comparable, however similar the plots.
Small-scale recovery gap
Section titled “Small-scale recovery gap”- What a household actually obtains — clean seed after cutting, drying, threshing, winnowing, and cleaning, with labor and losses attached — is Evidence: Unknown/Needs experiment (open questions 10–11; experiments E2–E3). A field-trial yield cannot be assumed to equal household recovery unless product definition, harvest method, and loss accounting match.
- Oil yield at household scale is a second multiplication by an unknown: small-press recovery per kg of clean seed is Evidence: Unknown (open question 13, marked “Needs experiment”).
Units and recording
Section titled “Units and recording”- Per
docs/methodology/evidence.md, any future value is recorded with level, type, conditions, and source id (S-####); seed yields ing/plant,g/m²,kg/ha; oil asg oil/kg clean seed— never blended.data/crops/sesame.yamlyieldnote already fixes: “never combine seed and extracted-oil yields.” - Yield scales follow
docs/methodology/units.md: choose the scale that matches the claim (g/plantandg/m²for a household bed;kg/haonly for field comparisons) and always state the area a number refers to.
Corpus share and transfer risk
Section titled “Corpus share and transfer risk”- The analyzer found 107 yield/economics metadata hits, but this broad unscreened count includes noisy or inapplicable records. The selected Myanmar, Uganda, smallholder, and Mexico candidates describe different systems; none may be transferred to a Mexican household plot without matching context.
- Every record that survives screening enters with its full context list (above) or not at all — this is how the project avoids manufacturing a fake “typical” sesame yield by averaging unlike conditions.
Unknowns and experiments
Section titled “Unknowns and experiments”- Seed yield for any cultivar in the intended environment — Evidence: Unknown.
- Household clean-seed recovery after all loss routes, with labor-hours — Evidence: Unknown; Evidence: Needs experiment (E2, E3).
- Small-press oil recovery per kg of clean seed — Evidence: Unknown; Evidence: Needs experiment (open question 13).
- Mexico-specific plot yields beyond the Guerrero G×E metadata lead — Evidence: Unknown.
Related pages
Section titled “Related pages”harvesting.md— loss routes between standing crop and clean seed.processing.md— the press step behind oil yield.economics.md— yield in farm budgets and efficiency studies.storage.md— postharvest losses after the yield is counted.open-questions.md— questions 10–13; experiments E2–E3.
Provenance
Section titled “Provenance”- Survey:
research/sesame-seeds/report.md— metadata-level; candidates pending human screening (survey §8). - Evidence rules:
docs/methodology/evidence.md. No DOI above is a registered source (S-####); none supports a yield value.